Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 02:23

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Pac-12’s new media rights deal will feel familiar to San Diego State fans - San Diego Union-Tribune
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Colorado confirms 3 more infections in airport-linked measles outbreak - CIDRAP
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Aaron Civale traded to White Sox for Andrew Vaughn - Brew Crew Ball
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Measles vaccination rates drop after COVID-19 pandemic in counties across the US - AP News
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: